0bama Tells Defense Contractors NOT to Issue Layoff Notices Over Sequestration

To contact us Click HERE
Seeing as most of the employees who work for defense contractors hate 0bama's guts, getting the contractors to NOT issue the legally required notices is just more smoke and mirrors from this most transparent administration in history.

Seeing as the notices would be mailed to the employees before the November elections, I guess Chairman MaoBama figures he can pull the wool/blow the smoke, and con the people into not knowing what's going on.

Article below is from The Hill:


The Obama administration issued new guidance intended fordefense contractors Friday afternoon, reiterating the administration’s positionthat the companies should not be issuing layoff notices over sequestration.
The Labor Department issued guidance in July saying it wouldbe “inappropriate” for contractors to issue notices of potential layoffstied to sequestration cuts. But a few contractors, most notably LockheedMartin, said they still were considering whether to issue the notices — whichwould be sent out just days before the November election.
But the Friday guidance from the Office of Management andBudget raised the stakes in the dispute, telling contractors that they would becompensated for legal costs if layoffs occur due to contract cancellationsunder sequestration — but only if the contractors follow the Labor guidance.
The guidance said that if plant closings or mass layoffsoccur under sequestration, then “employee compensation costs for [Worker Adjustmentand Retraining Notification] WARN act liability as determined by a court” wouldbe paid for covered by the contracting federal agency.

Senate Republicans, who accused the White House of trying tohide job losses after the first guidance, said Friday that the new OMBstatement “puts politics ahead of American workers.”“The Obama Administration is cynically trying to skirt theWARN Act to keep the American people in the dark about this looming nationalsecurity and fiscal crisis,” Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Lindsey Graham(R-S.C.) and Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) said in a statement. “The president shouldinsist that companies act in accordance with the clearly stated law and moveforward with the layoff notices.”
The fight over WARN Act notices began in June when LockheedMartin CEO Bob Stevens said his company might send the notices to all 123,000of its employees.
Some companies were hesitant to follow Lockheed, but severalothers told McCain in letters earlier this month they might send the notices,too, despite the Labor Department guidance.But the new guidance would appear to address one of thechief concerns from the companies — that they could be liable to compensateemployees who were laid off if the companies don’t issue the notices.The GOP senators complained, however, that this tactic wouldpush the cost of the layoffs onto taxpayers.A Lockheed Martin spokeswoman told The Hill that the companyis still reviewing the documents.

And there's another related article here.

.